5G Technology World

  • 5G Technology and Engineering
  • FAQs
  • Apps
  • Devices
  • IoT
  • RF
  • Radar
  • Wireless Design
  • Learn
    • 5G Videos
    • Ebooks
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQs
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars/Digital Events
  • Handbooks
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • EE World Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • Engineering Training Days
    • LEAP Awards
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

FCC Proposes $14.4M in Forfeitures for Lifeline Violations

By Staff Author | October 1, 2013

This story has been updated to include Tracfone’s response to the FCC’s actions. 

After a lengthy review of the FCC’s Lifeline program, which offers mobile phones to low-income consumers, the FCC late yesterday proposed more than $14.4 million in forfeitures against five wireless Lifeline service providers who apparently violated the commission’s Lifeline rules.  

According to a press release, the violations involve thousands of consumers who had more than one Lifeline subscription from the same provider, resulting in duplicative support requests and payments. 

The actions constitute the most recent step in the commission’s work to find waste, fraud, and abuse in the Lifeline program and preserve the overall integrity of the Universal Service Fund (USF).  

Specifically, the Notices of Apparent Liability (NALs) were issued against: Icon Telecom, Inc. ($4,806,381); TracFone Wireless, Inc. ($4,573,376); Assist Wireless, LLC ($2,203,977); Easy Telephone Services d/b/a/ Easy Wireless ($1,586,545); and UTPhone, Inc. ($1,234,456).

In each case, the FCC contends that the carrier knew or should have known, based on its own internal data, that the consumers were ineligible under Lifeline program rules. The penalties proposed in today’s NALs are in addition to recovery of USFs paid to the carriers for duplicative Lifeline service.

The commission says its rules prohibit, among other things, Lifeline service providers from requesting and/or receiving support for consumers who already receive Lifeline service.  The Commission also requires Lifeline service providers to carefully monitor their compliance with the Lifeline rules and recently cautioned that non-compliance would result in enforcement action.  

For the apparent violations uncovered in these cases, where the providers should have discovered the duplicates on their own, the NALs adopt a forfeiture framework, including:  (1) a separate forfeiture of $20,000 for each unlawful payment request seeking USF support for ineligible Lifeline subscribers; (2) a $5,000 forfeiture per ineligible subscriber; and (3) an upward adjustment of three times the total duplicate USF support payments requested and/or received.

In a statement, acting FCC Chairwoman Mignon Clyburn, said the goal of the forfeitures was to be “tough, but fair.”  

“The fines in these cases are purposely large,” Clyburn said. “However, I want to ensure adequate deterrence without harming the legitimate service these providers bring to their subscribers. Accordingly, I have instructed the Enforcement Bureau to carefully consider the companies’ responses to these NALs.”

Clyburn said the ultimate objective of the action was to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse, while preserving and promoting the availability of communications services to those in need.

Tracfone released a statement, saying that the FCC’s proposal only involved 850 people out of 4 million total Lifeline customers.  

“We will respond to the FCC at the appropriate time. However, we do not believe that our conduct violated any rules or that the proposed FCC action is warranted,” the company said, adding that the company has proposed many reforms to prevent waste, fraud and abuse of Universal Service Fund resources. “Some of those proposals were included in the FCC’s 2012 Lifeline rules. And TracFone continues to propose additional fraud prevention measures including a ban on in-person distribution of handsets associated with Lifeline services.”

 


Filed Under: Carriers

 

Next Article

← Previous Article
Next Article →

Related Articles Read More >

eSIM
eSIM eases changing carriers for phones and IoT
QoE and QoS comparison
Benchmarking in 5G: More important than ever
iPhone 12
I bought a 5G phone, now what?
6G
Key takeaways from 6G Symposium

Featured Contributions

  • Overcome Open RAN test and certification challenges
  • Wireless engineers need AI to build networks
  • Why AI chips need PCIe 7.0 IP interconnects
  • circuit board timing How timing and synchronization improve 5G spectrum efficiency
  • Wi-Fi 7 and 5G for FWA need testing
More Featured Contributions

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: Internet of Things
Explore practical strategies for minimizing attack surfaces, managing memory efficiently, and securing firmware. Download now to ensure your IoT implementations remain secure, efficient, and future-ready.

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center
“5g
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.

Engineering Training Days

engineering
“bills
5G Technology World
  • Enews Signup
  • EE World Online
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Analogic Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • Engineer’s Garage
  • EV Engineering
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy

Search 5G Technology World