5G Technology World

  • 5G Technology and Engineering
  • FAQs
  • Apps
  • Devices
  • IoT
  • RF
  • Radar
  • Wireless Design
  • Learn
    • 5G Videos
    • Ebooks
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQs
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars/Digital Events
  • Handbooks
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • EE World Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • Engineering Training Days
    • LEAP Awards
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Qualcomm Responds to $1B Apple Patent Royalty Lawsuit, Calling Claims “Baseless”

By Diana Goovaerts | January 23, 2017

Qualcomm fought back on Monday against claims made in Apple’s $1 billion patent royalty lawsuit, calling the allegations in Apple’s complaint “baseless” and an intentional mischaracterization of its agreements with the smartphone maker.

On Friday, Apple filed suit against Qualcomm for nearly $1 billion, alleging the latter has been “charging royalties for technologies they have nothing to do with” and charges the smartphone maker “at least five times more” than the sum of its agreements with other cellular patent licensors. Apple further claimed Qualcomm had decided to withhold “nearly $1 (billion) in payments from Apple as retaliation for responding truthfully to law enforcement agencies investigating them.”

“Apple believes deeply in innovation and we have always been willing to pay fair and reasonable rates for patents we use,” the company said in a press release. “We are extremely disappointed in the way Qualcomm is conducting its business with us and unfortunately after years of disagreement over what constitutes a fair and reasonable royalty we have no choice left but to turn to the courts.”

Apple’s decision to file a lawsuit came just two days after the Federal Trade Commission filed its own complaint against Qualcomm in a California court.

The FTC’s suit accused Qualcomm of maintaining a monopoly on baseband processors for mobile devices and alleged the company has used its dominant position to “impose onerous and anticompetitive supply and licensing terms on cell phone manufacturers and to weaken competitors.” Apple was among the companies named in the FTC suit as being directly impacted by Qualcomm’s practices, with the Commission noting Qualcomm bullied Apple into an exclusivity agreement from 2011 to 2016 through its “no license-no chips” licensing policy.

Qualcomm defended itself against the FTC allegations by calling the assertions simple “wrong” and claiming the Commission “still lacked basic information about the industry and was instead relying on inaccurate information and presumptions.”

And on Monday, Qualcomm shot back at Apple as well, noting in a statement “it is quite clear Apple’s claims are baseless.”

“Apple has intentionally mischaracterized our agreements and negotiations, as well as the enormity and value of the technology we have invented, contributed and shared with all mobile device makers through our licensing program,” Qualcomm’s statement read. “Apple has been actively encouraging regulatory attacks on Qualcomm’s business in various jurisdictions around the world, as reflected in the recent KFTC decision and FTC complaint, by misrepresenting facts and withholding information. We welcome the opportunity to have these meritless claims heard in court where we will be entitled to full discovery of Apple’s practices and a robust examination of the merits.”

As of 10:10 a.m. ET Monday, Qualcomm stocks were down more than 12 percent, as it seems investors are wary of the outcome of both suits following the issuance of at least two previous nearly billion-dollar fines to Qualcomm in the past.


Filed Under: Contracts

 

Next Article

← Previous Article
Next Article →

Related Articles Read More >

Ericsson Signs License Deal with Intellectual Ventures, Ending Patent Litigation
Nokia Boasts 42 Commercial 5G Pacts
FT: Huawei Cuts Meetings With US, Sends US Workers Home
Huawei Asks Court to Rule US Security Law Unconstitutional

Featured Contributions

  • Overcome Open RAN test and certification challenges
  • Wireless engineers need AI to build networks
  • Why AI chips need PCIe 7.0 IP interconnects
  • circuit board timing How timing and synchronization improve 5G spectrum efficiency
  • Wi-Fi 7 and 5G for FWA need testing
More Featured Contributions

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: 5G Technology
This Tech Toolbox covers the basics of 5G technology plus a story about how engineers designed and built a prototype DSL router mostly from old cellphone parts. Download this first 5G/wired/wireless communications Tech Toolbox to learn more!

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center
“5g
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.

Engineering Training Days

engineering
“bills
5G Technology World
  • Enews Signup
  • EE World Online
  • DesignFast
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Analogic Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • Engineer’s Garage
  • EV Engineering
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy

Search 5G Technology World