5G Technology World

  • 5G Technology and Engineering
  • FAQs
  • Apps
  • Devices
  • IoT
  • RF
  • Radar
  • Wireless Design
  • Learn
    • 5G Videos
    • Ebooks
    • EE Training Days
    • FAQs
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Toolboxes
    • Webinars/Digital Events
  • Handbooks
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
  • Resources
    • Design Guide Library
    • EE World Digital Issues
    • Engineering Diversity & Inclusion
    • Engineering Training Days
    • LEAP Awards
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

What’s the difference between a VCSEL and PCSEL?

By Jeff Shepard | May 14, 2025

A vertical cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) relies on a three-dimensional (3D) structure for light emission. A photonic crystal surface-emitting laser (PCSEL) incorporates a 2D photonic crystal (PhC) layer to manipulate light emission. Those structural differences lead to different performance and application possibilities.

An obvious difference between the various types of semiconductor lasers is the beam patterns. VCSELs and PCSELs emit light perpendicular to the chip surface, but PCSELs produce a smaller beam pattern than VCSELs.

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) also emit light perpendicular to the chip surface, but emissions spread out laterally for a more diffuse beam. Edge-emitting lasers (EELs) are available in two common designs: Fabry-Perot (FP) and distributed feedback (DFB). Both produce oblong beams from the edge of the die (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Comparison of major solid-state laser technologies. The beam patterns (right-hand column) are a key differentiator. (Image: Vector Photonics)

Performance comparison

Some key performance differences between VCSELs and PCSELs include:

  • To maintain single-mode operation, VCSELs have smaller active areas that limit their maximum output power. The PhC layer in PCSELs can support a larger active area, resulting in higher output power and better single-mode emissions.
  • VCSELs are generally less flexible in emission wavelengths compared with PCSELs.
  • VCSELs have been in production long enough that their costs have declined. PCSELs, on the other hand, are still an emerging technology, resulting in higher costs.
  • In portable devices, VCSELs are better suited for lower-power applications like optical communications, facial recognition, and time-of-flight (ToF) sensors. Anticipated applications for PCSELs include higher-power and higher-speed optical communications, industrial and automotive LIDAR, and biomedical sensors.

Getting under the hood

The vertical structure of VCSELs produces emissions that are normal to the device surface. That simplifies system integration and coupling VCSELs to optical fibers, reducing system costs, and was one of the inspirations for developing PCSELs.

Typical designs of VCSELs and PCSELs include multiple quantum well (MQW) gain sections that use the quantum confinement effect within multiple thin layers of semiconductor material to amplify the light.

The key differentiator is how the two technologies achieve optical confinement. In a VCSES, the distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) are replaced with a PhC in PCSELs (Figure 2).

Figure 2. The 3D DBR structure in a VCSEL (a) is replaced with a 2D PhC in a PCSEL (b) (images not to scale). (Image: Optical Materials Express)

PCSEL promises

PCSELs promise to advance solid-state laser technology in several ways. They can deliver high, coherent power, phase control that enables beam steering, and high-speed modulation, and their straightforward fabrication promises low cost once high production volumes are achieved.

Arrays of PCSELs can support high power levels. The in-plane light is linked between the individual lasers, creating coherence. That coherent light can produce a small spot of high-intensity laser light.

PCSEL arrays can produce several kW of coherent power, which is not possible with VCSELs or other technologies. This makes PCSEL arrays useful for metal cutting, welding, melting, and other industrial processes.

In addition, the individual elements in a PCSEL array can be steered in real time as a phased array. This has potential applications in systems like LIDAR and high-power 3D printing of metals and plastics.

PCSELs are 2.5x faster than VCSELs. That makes them useful for high-speed data transmissions in the multi-Gb range.

The advantage in high-speed communications derives partially from PCSELs’ wavelength flexibility. Their structure enables them to be fabricated from a range of semiconductor materials that can produce different wavelengths.

High-volume VCSEL production is currently possible using gallium arsenide (GaAs) emitting 850 nm light. VCSELS are difficult to produce using indium phosphide (InP). PCSELs are readily fabricated using InP and can produce 1310 and 1550 nm emissions for higher-speed data communication.

Summary

PCSELs are being developed to build on the success of VCSELs with expanded functionality. They replace the 3D DBR structure in a VCSEL with a 2D PhC element. PCSELs can deliver tighter beam patterns, higher power, faster modulation, and support a wider variety of wavelengths compared to VCSELs.

References

A Simple Method to Build High Power PCSEL Array with Isolation Pattern Design, MDPI crystals
Demonstration of high-power photonic-crystal surface-emitting lasers with 1-kHz-class intrinsic linewidths, Optica
Performance Analyses of Photonic-Crystal Surface-Emitting Laser: Toward High-Speed Optical Communication, Nanoscale Research Letters
Photonic crystal lasers: from photonic crystal surface emitting lasers (PCSELs) to hybrid external cavity lasers (HECLs) and topological PhC lasers, Optical Materials Express
The semiconductor laser revolution, Vector Photonics
The Tiny Ultrabright Laser that Can Melt Steel, IEEE Spectrum
What is the difference between laser diodes and VCSELs?, RPMC Lasers

EEWorld Online related links

How can a machine recognize hand gestures?
What sensors are used in AR/VR systems?
How are optical interconnects being miniaturized?
Lasers and how to measure their output
Finding the correct LiDAR application


Filed Under: FAQ, Featured
Tagged With: FAQ
 

Next Article

← Previous Article
Next Article →

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Articles Read More >

Peter Vetter interview
Nokia Bell Labs’ Peter Vetter talks 6G research
Antennas to bits: Modeling real-world behavior in RF and wireless systems
Fragmentation in wireless standards: an RF specialist’s analysis
What Are Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS) that enable 6G Networks?

Featured Contributions

  • Antennas to bits: Modeling real-world behavior in RF and wireless systems
  • Fragmentation in wireless standards: an RF specialist’s analysis
  • Overcome Open RAN test and certification challenges
  • Wireless engineers need AI to build networks
  • Why AI chips need PCIe 7.0 IP interconnects
More Featured Contributions

EE TECH TOOLBOX

“ee
Tech Toolbox: Power Efficiency
Discover proven strategies for power conversion, wide bandgap devices, and motor control — balancing performance, cost, and sustainability across industrial, automotive, and IoT systems.

EE LEARNING CENTER

EE Learning Center
“5g
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for EE professionals.

Engineering Training Days

engineering
“bills
5G Technology World
  • Enews Signup
  • EE World Online
  • EDABoard Forums
  • Electro-Tech-Online Forums
  • Microcontroller Tips
  • Analogic Tips
  • Connector Tips
  • Engineer’s Garage
  • EV Engineering
  • Power Electronic Tips
  • Sensor Tips
  • Test and Measurement Tips
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy

Search 5G Technology World